0 Comments
Mind control isn't necessary to fulfill human trafficking, but it helps, especially in cases where a high-profile client is being serviced. This testimony in three parts (one, two, and three) doesn't dwell on anything in particular but gives a broad overview of the life of a slave. This account fits the profile of mind control and human/sex/child trafficking. Why she would put her life at risk to make these statements is beyond me, as she doesn't seek to find justice but, rather, some sort of peace and healing. I wish her all of that.
Thank you for reading, and God bless. Not that anyone in the know really questioned this, but this article reveals just how deep she is into the elite's favorite game of sex/child trafficking. Why is it celebrities have to adopt children from disadvantaged backgrounds? (Think Angelina Jolie.) I don't know, but this is gross. Here's the story.
Thank you for reading, and God bless. There is a reason the U.S. is funneling insane amounts of money to Ukraine. Is there actually a war? Some say no. Some say the money is used for something else entirely. It wouldn't be the first time someone lied to the American people. Anything this administration is doing is suspect, if you ask me.
Ukraine has long be considered the prostitution capital of the world, and for good reason. The women are beautiful. The economy is crap. People do stuff for money they wouldn't do otherwise. And, Slavic girls are used to being treated like crap. I forgot the statistics, but many come from a background of abuse and infidelity. It's very common, unfortunately. Don't get me started on the orphanages there. Anyway, this article from Vigilant Citizen is quite disturbing. It reveals what's going on in Ukraine, even though it's considered "fashion." It's not for the faint of heart, so be careful. I had a hard time with these images because I come from a background of abuse myself. Thank you for reading, and God bless. Here's another weird story about human trafficking. Looks like people are calling it aquariumgate, similar to pizzagate. Decide for yourself. Here are a couple of links. Link one. And link two.
Thank you for reading, and God bless. I don't know this woman's body of work. I know she's a celebrity. But her supposed death (if she actually died, I mean, who knows) or probably sacrifice (we are talking about Hollywood, which is full of satanists, even the name refers to witchcraft) is really sad. And, even more bizarrely, they wanted us to see she was sacrificed. That's the evil of these people. Here's what we're doing. What you gonna do about it?
Here is a breakdown of the weirdness surrounding her death. Then we find out she was supposedly working on a film that talked about sex trafficking? Human trafficking (including sex trafficking), which is slavery, has always been the most profitable trade in humanity's history. It's bizarre that so few people know anything about it. Slavery isn't dead. It's all around us. Heche was clearly an industry slave. She even admitted her father molested her, which is where it starts. She was a monarch slave, beta slave, whatever you want to say. It looks like her suffering is now over, at least. I pray for the release of those who are crying out, who are mired in bondage of all kinds. God can set them free. But we need an army to do His will. Pray God sends His workers, for the harvest is now. Lots going on here. Here's another link. And another. Thank you for reading, and God bless. Disturbing Behavior was released in theaters in 1998. It adhered to the teen movie formula of the day. I recently rewatched the movie because I'm on a retrospective kick. The first time, I saw the movie soon after it came out, probably on VHS (!). Katie Holmes, whom I'm sure I found attractive (though not traditionally so), of Dawson's Creek was in the movie, but besides that, I enjoyed 90s teen movies. They were fun, though formulaic. One funny thing about rewatching the movie is they made the captions clean but kept the dialog the same. And, well, it was the 90s, which was a lot more fun than today.
Here's what IMDB has to say about the movie: "After the suicide of the teenager Allen Clark, his family decides to move from Chicago to the quiet Cradle Bay Island seeking a peaceful life for the siblings Steve and Lindsay Clark. When Steve joins the local high-school, the outcast Gavin Strick befriends Steve and introduces his also rejected friend Rachel Wagner to the newcomer. Gavin exposes to Steve in the refectory the punks, the nerds and the different tribes of the school and he defends the weird theory that a sinister force changes the behavior of the annoyingly perfect "Blue Ribbons", a group of good students that wear identical jackets and gather in the Yogurt Shoppe. Further he tells that he had witnessed the blue ribbon Andy Efkin killing their schoolmate Mary Jo that is missing and the local Officer Cox covering the murder. Steve does not believe on Gavin words, but when his friend is submitted to the treatment of Dr. Edgar Caldicott and immediately changes his behavior, joining the Blue Ribbons, Steve and Rachel decides to investigate the mystery discovering the dark secret of the perfect behavior." Nothing seems too disturbing about that, right? On the surface, the movie is typical light horror stuff. But, after reading Tim Shelley's (of Fighting Monarch) two books, I had a different reaction than the first time I watched. Tim is a third-generation survivor of U.S. and U.K. mind-control programs. He is still afflicted to this day, as well as his family, which is why he runs the website. What he described in his books was portrayed in Disturbing Behavior, even down to the ocular implants. (A character even called it "the program," which is how the CIA has long referred to their various mind-control programs.) What I saw was a movie about mind control (a term also used in the movie) technology that has been/is currently being used. It was quite upsetting. The human brain can be programmed to do just about anything, but those programming are programmed themselves and simply pass along the slave programs. Such is mankind's history and, sadly, its future. This movie about mind control isn't designed to make you consider your own slavery or the fact that we are all under mind control. It was just an edgy plot designed to entertain you. For the vast majority it was just entertainment. And then forgotten. The first time I saw the movie, I thought, "Well, this is a clever — though overused — way of pointing out the dangers of conformity." Indeed, but it's so much more. It's funny, I went for a hike recently on a popular hiking trail. I don't get out much. I don't come across many women in my daily life, and I noticed almost every single woman was wearing the same thing. Literally the same clothes. It was fascinating. Do they all go to the same website? The same store? Do women have uniforms for hiking? Maybe it was just a weird day. Or maybe this is normal now. I wouldn't know. I don't get out much. Maybe you're wondering why the powers that be would choose to reveal their mind-control programs in a teen flick. I get that. But it's all around us in everything: books, movies, TV, music, advertising, sports, etc. Where do they not put this stuff? And, it's a clever way to inform society (which is something they supposedly have to do to avoid karmic guilt or something) without actually saying what is going on and what the plan is. It's a good cover. If you mention mind-control programming to someone, they will say something like, "Oh, I think I saw a movie like that," as if you were just confused and conflated a very real situation with the non-reality of a film. Truth in movies; lies on the news. The movie is disturbing because it uses entertainment to show us what they are actually doing. In addition to that, Katie Holmes is in the movie. I used to keep track of her life because she is from Toledo, Ohio, (which is about 15 minutes from where I used to live) and I think her family still lives there. I would read news articles about her life and very amazing path to celebrity stardom. But, she is a clear slave and was even married to Tom Cruise, a rumored homosexual, confirmed Scientologist (a mind-control source for many entertainers), and overall creep. As I followed her career, I could see the life drain from her eyes. Today, her eyes are vacant, as are those of many slaves. The powers that be love to put their slaves in films like this because it reinforces their programming as well as makes light of their situation. Truly disgusting. I have another film in my queue featuring Katie, where it looks like her slavery is also mocked. I don't think I'll watch it. Celebrities are used to further the elite's agendas, whether they are performing or just in their everyday lives. The elite prefer their slaves never forget they are slaves. Consider Britney Spears (here is a good article) singing I'm a slave 4 U. Even mainstream folks seem to sense something is wrong in her life, especially now. But it's always been out there. I recall my mom praising her because she gave the glory to God for some award she won. I thought she should thank her navel because her music was purely about sex. But they wanted her to appear down home and wholesome while she was selling sex to little kids in pop songs. A believer would have trouble with that paradox. A slave wouldn't be able to question it. Her father is her original handler, though she has many. She even used the term "sex trafficking" in her recent hearing. She went through the Disney programming so is definitely a beta (sex) slave. Her Instagram account is one way they prostitute her; it is bizarre and doesn't make any sense otherwise. What is clear is programmers are and have been using cybernetics for a while to control our thoughts and actions. The movie gave us a rudimentary look at that. And, it looks like the new vaccines have cybernetics in them, too. Stay away from those vaccines, kids. Remember, Bill Gates' doctor said Billy Boy never had his kids vaccinated. He's no dummy. The elite puts their plans in front of us, though they are hidden to most. Those with understanding can decode the message. It's not a great stretch to see Disturbing Behavior is a fairly accurate movie about mind-control. It makes me ponder the minds that created the movie. They know. They're telling us. Now you know. What can we do about it? Nothing, probably. But God can do something. Now is a good time to pray. I'll leave with that. Thank you all for reading, and God bless. This is a rare moment when I don't know how to put thoughts into words. This story is very troubling. Just the headline is enough. I'll give you a moment to read it. The last quote says it all. And I would argue the situation wasn't merely allowed but promoted.
The conclusion I come to when I read things like this is how could God not judge my country? The basic institutions of my country are controlled by satan. We are not a good people and not a good nation to allow these things to happen. The above story is an example of institutionalized violence and rape against children. God is very clear He will avenge those who are most powerless: women (widows, especially) and children. The most demonic societies in the world regularly mistreat their women and children. And the U.S. is now one of them. This is not an isolated incident, as I know similar things happened at a youth treatment facility near where I live. The facility has since been shuttered and sold. The above story reveals an ugly truth: this country allows (and propagates) state-sponsored torture, sex trafficking, and rape. This is not a small story. And not an isolated incident. Read any of the number of books about MK ULTRA or mind-control programs and you will soon realize state-sponsored trauma is common. Expect to see more of these kinds of stories in the years to come, if the media allows. And that's a bit of a problem I have with this story. It was allowed for a reason. Not sure why. Consider the freemason signaling in the story, the 33 and 66 (33 x 2). If you think that is a coincidence, it is not. My guess is the youth facility is still open for those things mentioned above. The near-daily shootings in my country (I assume all are psyops) since the anti-gun president took control will lead to disarming the population. People will ask for it. For their protection. And that will be the end of this republic, of course, because everywhere gun confiscation goes, genocide follows. Mark my words. God will allow it because we are not a godly nation anymore. Many point to state-sponsored abortion (we all pay for murder) as a reason for our nation's decline. I agree. And this story is another reason. We can't say it's not our problem anymore because it is. It spells the end of our nation. The end of lives. Our children's lives. That will come soon after. Unless God's people humble themselves, pray and seek God's face, and turn from their wicked ways soon, our future is bleak. The future the devil wants is a boot stamping on a human face forever. God offers us a way out. It's not necessary that the whole nation's heart returns to God. Only God's people. Let's pray for that. Amen? Thank you for reading, and God bless. Words fail when I think of the JonBenet Ramsey murder, which took place Christmas 1996. My conclusion is she was part of a trauma-based mind control (TBMC) program and her murder was accidental. She certainly fits the profile for TBMC victims. Some of what we know about her life directly follows fellow slaves' accounts. The fashion shows and precocious outfits are a dead giveaway something wasn't right in the Ramsey house. Volumes have already been written about this subject, so I'll try not to add a lot more. I would, however, like to share some links that pertain to this case.
This article comes about the closest to detailing what I think happened to little JonBenet. TBMC survivor Cathy O'Brien concurs, as you see in the article. Also, Brice Taylor agreed with that assessment. After the murder, scrutiny was placed upon JonBenet's parents, and those in the know quickly seized upon some very strange things about her parents. JonBenet's mom just looks like a TBMC slave to me. I guess I'm not alone in that thought. It appears they were CIA operatives. This article says she was a satanic sacrifice, but I have problems with going that route, mainly because sacrifices are normally people who don't technically exist. Sacrifices are bred especially for that purpose, and they are rarely people who are already in society. A lot of babies are sacrificed. Normally, the sacrifice is consumed, or at least, the organs are. They don't want bodies complicating things. Sometimes well-known celebrities are used for ritual killings, but the intention is to generate mass anguish in that case. It appears to me JonBenet was being groomed for something. She was clearly in the child-sex trade. She bore markings similar to what Cathy O'Brien said were stun gun marks on her own body. Stun guns are used in programming slaves. The Ramseys were in possession of a stun gun. Seems like a strange thing to have, doesn't it? I don't know anyone who has one, and they are more common today than in 1996. Anyway, the Ramseys' behavior after the murder was highly suspicious. I don't think they intended to kill JonBenet because they were completely disorganized in their actions and statements afterward. They had not planned for that beforehand. In a way, I understand her death as a sort of sacrifice, if one considers the CIA is full of satanists. She was certainly sacrificed under the auspices of the CIA, so, thus, she was a sacrifice of sorts, though unintended. From what I surmise, JonBenet's parents were CIA, working to create a TBMC slave. I question whether or not JonBenet was even their biological daughter, as actual parents are sometimes not used (as in Brice Taylor's case) for programming. The biological parents farm out that work to underlings, who they also control. The breeders are often not the programmers. The elite want certain bloodlines kept pure, but the programming can be done by anyone. I'm guessing that is what happened with JonBenet, but that's just me guessing. One of those articles also talks about Bill Gates and his role in mind-control programs (the end of free will, that sounds great, doesn't it?). He's definitely up to a lot of no good. He's like the mean, nasty kid on the playground no one wants to play with. Look out, here comes little Billy. He's up to no good again. The powers that be have technology that is far more advanced than we can imagine. They are decades ahead of what we have, and they are always 20 steps ahead. Mind control programming now is different from what it was decades ago, though TBMC still works and is still used. But, think more along the lines of implantable stuff and frequencies that control behavior. Whatever your mind can ponder about this subject, they're probably doing it. Truth in movies, fiction on the news. You'd think we'd be closer to understanding what happened, especially nearly 25 years after the fact, but the information above, I believe, is as close as we will get to knowing for sure. The patterns described by former TBMC slaves match up with JonBenet's short life. Unfortunately, she was probably one of the lucky ones, as she died too soon to endure a lifetime of being used by the elite satanists who were clearly in control of her life. I read somewhere the programmers prefer females because they are more moldable, have more uses, and usually survive the programming methods better than males. As a survivor of a sort of unintentional TBMC program myself (child abuse/trauma), I know sometimes death seems like the answer. But when I die isn't up to me. I love my God and want to be obedient, even though I dreadfully want to go home. But, soon enough. Every day is one day closer to eternity with my Heavenly Father. Many mind-control victims are crying out for justice. I pray we see a revival such as the world has never seen before, just to set them free. God hears your cries. I believe liberation is coming soon. Stay strong. Thank you for reading, and God bless. Here begins my second attempt at writing about Elizabeth Smart and trauma-based mind control (TBMC). Who knew it would be such a colossal undertaking and fraught with unforeseen obstacles? Perhaps that is dramatic. I worked for two or three hours on a post Weebly decided to delete instead of post, which wasn't even the beginning of sorrows. I also sent myself an email with links I planned to use weeks ago, and the email disappeared. Since writing about TBMC on my old blog, I had a number of similar issues, and it seems the issues followed me. I'm not suggesting something nefarious is happening technologically (though the thought did cross my mind), but perhaps something spiritually happened. Let's try again.
As a refresher, or if you've never heard of Elizabeth Smart, you can read about her ordeal being kidnapped, ritually married, and raped daily when she was 14. It was a major storyline nearly two decades ago. As a bonus, the article relates how she was once asked while on a date if she enjoyed being raped when she was a captive. No, she didn't enjoy being raped, dude. Yes, some women have a rape fantasy (though I think it is a mislabeled submission fantasy), but Elizabeth was brought up Mormon, and Mormonism barely allows for married women to have pleasure in married sex. But this is more of the "men bad" agenda, both the man's question and fundamentalism/patriarchy in general. But let's not digress so early. Let's start with the Mormon church, which Fritz Springmeier tells us is a mind-controlled slave factory. Even from the outside, something appears to be not quite right with that church system. In my neck of the woods, we have a FLDS (Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) compound, which is an offshoot of Mormonism that still practices polygamy/child marriage, as well as other illegal activities. Their compound, now largely deserted, was heavily defended. If you neared their property, the expectation was to be met by armed guards. If you want to be left alone or be invisible, South Dakota is the place to be. The stories from women who escaped the FLDS bondage are telling. The system is sick and broken, though it considers itself a part of Christianity. I consider it a cult, though many consider it remotely related to Christianity, enough to tarnish true Christianity. When I originally heard Elizabeth's story, I had many questions. Things simply didn't add up. Shoddy police work, a flimsy narrative, and bad actors conspired to produce more questions than answers. I didn't like the fact that the kidnapper came in through an open window, she was abducted while laying next to her sister (they shared a bed), and her sister did nothing for two hours before she told her parents. She was afraid of being abducted, too, but once the kidnapper left, why wouldn't you run and tell your parents? Or why wouldn't you scream your fool head off when you saw someone roaming about your house in the middle of the night? That would be a knee-jerk reaction to something novel and startling. But perhaps things like that happened frequently, such as is the case with TBMC victims. I don't like all the questions that were never answered (JonBenet Ramsey, anyone?). Elizabeth wandered the streets with her captors in her own town, often near her home. She wasn't looking for an opportunity to escape. She accepted her situation, which is clear evidence of mind control. According to her parents, she took only a few days after being home to go back to her normal self. Huh? More evidence of prior abuse. Her sister was the key to what happened all along, and when she decided she remembered who kidnapped Elizabeth, that's when the case was cracked? Why didn't Elizabeth want to leave her captors? Her dad said she was "brainwashed," but was it just Stockholm Syndrome or TBMC? They are one and the same. Why was the window open, allowing the captor to waltz right in? Why why why? If you ask questions, you are the bad guy. The shrill voices ask, "Hasn't she been through enough?" I know, from my own experience, human beings don't always think rationally when under extreme stress. But that doesn't take away the feeling there is much more going on here. Consider this reaction to Elizabeth being interviewed: "The incredible grace of kidnap victim Elizabeth Smart clashed with the 'mindless callousness' of Nancy Grace, which the Columbia Journalism Review declared 'might have set a new standard.' While Smart thought she was on the show to talk about a bill about a sex offenders’ registry, Grace kept asking her about her abduction, including the veil her kidnapper made her wear in public, until the Utah woman shut down the 'insane' lawyer from Atlanta." Got that? Don't question the narrative. Pedophilia is one way the new world order gets things done. Pedophiles are easily blackmailed, as are cheaters and the like. But most people have an extreme disdain for pedophilia. Notice the powers that be are trying to change our associations about pedophilia, making it seem like just another sexual lifestyle. But blackmail is a huge mover and shaker in the the new world order. The basest human beings are the most blackmailable. After Elizabeth was abducted, scrutiny turned to Ed, her father because authorities thought he was being blackmailed because he is gay. That is an odd first thought, don't you think? I believe he was blackmailed before that, though, and his daughters and wife were in mind-control programs. Blackmail is a constant fear in TBMC families. And now Ed is promoting the gay agenda, like a good slave. I am absolutely certain this man had more to hide than his homosexuality. Brice Taylor, a mind-controlled slave, was groomed to become "internationally known as a leader in ritual child abuse," (meaning she campaigned against those things) according to her book, and that is more than a little ironic, considering what she and her children endured. Using an abused, mind-controlled slave and her children for this supposed purpose is just sick. And diabolical. The truth is truly stranger than fiction. If they were doing this double-bind sort of thing with their slaves in the 70s, surely they are doing the same and more now. Elizabeth Smart founded an organization dedicated to preventing sexual assault/abuse/trafficking, speaks about her experiences frequently, and has even blamed porn for what happened to her. Why porn? Yes, porn is bad and leads many men astray. Most of the men and women in porn are TBMC victims. Its purpose is to debase society (a new world order goal). But blaming porn for her ritual abuse and mind control is ... a clever diversion. And who is going to defend porn? Not too many. It's a perversion of something God gifted to married couples. It is bondage labeled as freedom. Considering her crusades against sexual abuse and porn, it is entirely possible her controllers use her in those very ways, though not for the mainstream consumer but for higher levels. Most porn is produced with low-level slaves who are used and then quickly discarded. If Elizabeth is used that way, it is not mainstream. Also, I question all philanthropic organizations because experience taught me they are often fronts for the very thing they supposedly combat. How many children's organizations are busted for abusing and trafficking children? More than just a mere coincidence. Fritz Springmeier mentions the use of philanthropic entities such as women's shelters and orphanages to catch runaway mind-controlled slaves. I hate to say it, but when I see someone who is most likely a mind-controlled slave campaigning for a cause, I wonder what the true agenda is. Unfortunately, the devil does not play fair, and we should not be ignorant of his devices. Those familiar with the book The Franklin Cover-up know Nebraska's Boys Town has been running slaves for decades, and much of the programming is done through the Roman Catholic System (such as what happened to Cathy O'Brien), which to many can do no wrong. Beware of philanthropic institutions and those with a religious guise because they are often doing the devil's work. I already mentioned the instance with Nancy Grace when Elizabeth dodged questions about her abduction, instead focusing on "pushing the bill through." Here is someone who regularly speaks about her abduction (about 80 times a year), but she didn't want to talk about it then? Why? Because her handlers want to push through legislation, just as they did with Brice Taylor. And now Elizabeth is on board with a movie about her experiences. Movies about (supposedly) real events are always propaganda designed to shape public opinion. Wouldn't we all want our life's worst moments captured forever on film? The devil's henchmen also like their slaves to know they can't run or hide and the abuse will continue. Consider Elizabeth's recent sexual assault on an airplane. As we all know, one cannot run away on an airplane. A slave is always a slave, no matter where they are. And, a lot of the time, Elizabeth is at speaking engagements, talking about her experiences. I found something interesting about one of those engagements. This article about Ghislaine Maxwell "staring down" Elizabeth at one of her speaking engagements/fundraisers is curious, needless to say. If you don't know who Maxwell is, she is Jeffrey Epstein's mind-controlled sex slave procurement robot. That's a long title. She's a lackey for Epstein (who is most definitely not dead, as he was photographed by drone on his island after his supposed suicide). She's also a handler. Most slaves are also handlers; that's part of the progression. What was a sex-trafficking slave/handler doing at Elizabeth Smart's speaking engagement, considering Elizabeth endured exactly what Maxwell did for Epstein? Because Elizabeth is a slave. And many "rich men of the earth" have desires for illegal things like underage girls/sex slaves. Many, including the Clintons, British Royalty, Mark Zuckerberg, and President Trump, as well as many athletes and celebrities, found their way to Epstein's island. The constant need for sex slaves drives the new world order agenda. Lots of blackmail and coercion. If you know what Wizard of Oz programming is, this article will raise your hackles. I even read another article that referred to Elizabeth as a sort of Dorothy. If I had only read one, I may not have caught it. But two separate articles called her Dorothy. This site says this about the red shoes: "The transfer of the Ruby slippers from the Wicked Witch of the East to Dorothy publicly depicts the real method of transference of power used in Illuminati rituals." Not only that, this article reveals something else. The night she was abducted, Elizabeth read a book to her little sister. That book? Ella Enchanted. Read the first paragraph about the plot (of the movie, same as the book) here, and I think you'll agree it sounds a lot like mind-control programming. She's under a spell to be obedient? What a nice bedtime story. They have to constantly reinforce the programming, and it is important the rest of us are programmed, as well. Much of the article is garbage, of course, but makes the point that Mormonism's fundamental ideas about sex and purity (which most will translate to Christianity) are wrong, which is ... sigh ... part of the new world order agenda, which is to debase ourselves with sexual impurity. Elizabeth didn't have a choice. But the rest of us do. Well, most of us. The New Yorker article is full of references most will not catch, but those familiar with TBMC will understand they are telling us she is a slave. This blog mentions something interesting, which I did not consider at first. Elizabeth went missing for 9 months. Could it be she had a child during that time? TBMC victims are often chosen to have children for use within the beast system for many reasons. It's not impossible she had a child. The storyline was too convenient anyway. Her sister just decided one day she remembered who took Elizabeth? The guy who kidnapped her was a crazy messianic Mormon, anyway, right? He was completely demonized. So, case closed. But her captor did a whole lot of things a religious zealot would never do, such as drink alcohol and watch porn, and force Elizabeth to do the same. But he was crazy, right? While I'm on that tangent, many have pointed out all the celebrities who had miscarriages. They must be in a high-risk group for miscarriages? Or those babies are used for something else? I know many miscarriages are just that. It is very sad to lose a little one. But it seems disproportionate that Hollywood and the like are having so many miscarriages. Hollywood = witchcraft, after all. And most celebrities are slaves. It is clear, even though I simply went through mostly mainstream media sites (and getting any truth from Google these days is hard), Elizabeth Smart is a mind-controlled slave, and a high-level one. She was chosen probably before she was born for this position. She and her children are still being used for various new world order functions. My heart cries out for her liberation, and I pray one day she and her family are liberated from TBMC. Her poise, and even her body posture, and way of speaking remind me of other mind-controlled slaves (many of whom I admire). It is that poise that makes her message so readily accepted by her audience. Part of her function is to tear down aspects of fundamental Christianity, to point fingers at the church (most people don't know Mormonism isn't true Christianity) and say they set her up for abuse or taught her wrong. Her father's programming does the same thing. He had to leave the church because there is no place for a gay man in Mormonism. Elizabeth Smart's story is used by many advocating microchipping children, which is something the Masons in my neck of the woods constantly push, too. Why do the Smart family advocacies involve new world order goals? Part of the new world order agenda is normalizing trauma, and not only that, but making it something good, as this story relates. She's grateful for what she endured? TBMC is rooted in generational, satanic abuse families. The design is to create a master race or ruling class structure (imagine a pyramid with the slave race as the base). TBMC is a dehumanizing process, but we are told it is much like a caterpillar becoming a butterfly. In the end, what we have is something beautiful. That's wrong, of course. In the end, we have a robot slave and no longer a human being with all their faculties. And they want to export that process to the rest of humanity, creating a planet of slaves. Am I 100 percent positive about Elizabeth Smart being a slave? No, but maybe 99 percent. The Smarts fit the TBMC mold, the pattern of which I am aware. Even those familiar with TBMC may not see it to the extent I do. But that's the point. It is supposed to be an undetectable weapon. Is it possible Elizabeth endured some other form of mind control programming? Yes, TBMC is not the only kind, though I don't think the others are as effective at creating and maintaining the inner worlds. Dissociation that comes with trauma is what does that work. But it is possible. But a slave is a slave, no matter how they were created. It's also possible the whole story of her abduction and rape was made up. Why do we trust people who are clearly lying to tell us what happened? All we know is something happened that wasn't right. The actual perpetrators of that, I believe, are still at large. I would like to add more to this post, but it is long enough. I pray for the release of all TBMC victims. My God is all-powerful and wants to set the captives free. (John 8:36, Isaiah 61:1) I pray the coming revival includes the liberation of millions of TBMC slaves. I'm ready to go to work. (Isaiah 6:8) Thank you for reading, and God bless. |
A nameless warrior“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” - John 8:32 Archives
February 2022
Categories
All
|